<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1674 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279119</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, reducing the disallowance of expenses on an ad-hoc basis from Rs. 1,82,609 to Rs. 1,00,000. The Tribunal considered the evidence provided by the assessee in the form of bills and vouchers, striking a balance between substantiated claims and potential personal use of expenses. This decision aimed to provide relief to the assessee while emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and justification of expenditures in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:47:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1674 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279119</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, reducing the disallowance of expenses on an ad-hoc basis from Rs. 1,82,609 to Rs. 1,00,000. The Tribunal considered the evidence provided by the assessee in the form of bills and vouchers, striking a balance between substantiated claims and potential personal use of expenses. This decision aimed to provide relief to the assessee while emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and justification of expenditures in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>