<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1848 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279124</link>
    <description>Fresh mining leases were required after expiry of the earlier leases, and second renewals could not be substituted for a direction to start afresh. The text also explains that there is no absolute constitutional rule requiring auction or competitive bidding for every natural resource allocation, although those methods may be preferable in appropriate cases. On the facts described, the second renewals were invalid because they were granted hastily despite statutory violations, environmental damage, and a lack of proper application of mind. Fresh environmental clearances were also required before operations could resume, so the abeyance-lifting orders could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:47:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1848 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279124</link>
      <description>Fresh mining leases were required after expiry of the earlier leases, and second renewals could not be substituted for a direction to start afresh. The text also explains that there is no absolute constitutional rule requiring auction or competitive bidding for every natural resource allocation, although those methods may be preferable in appropriate cases. On the facts described, the second renewals were invalid because they were granted hastily despite statutory violations, environmental damage, and a lack of proper application of mind. Fresh environmental clearances were also required before operations could resume, so the abeyance-lifting orders could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>