<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17113</link>
    <description>For surtax computation under the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, dividend and royalty deductions were to be taken on net income, not gross receipt. The explanatory treatment of rule 1 was treated as clarificatory and aligned the surtax computation with the corresponding income-tax scheme, so the net-income principle applied to earlier assessment years as well. The contrary gross-based approach was rejected, and the Tribunal&#039;s view allowing gross dividend and gross royalty deductions was disapproved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17113</link>
      <description>For surtax computation under the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, dividend and royalty deductions were to be taken on net income, not gross receipt. The explanatory treatment of rule 1 was treated as clarificatory and aligned the surtax computation with the corresponding income-tax scheme, so the net-income principle applied to earlier assessment years as well. The contrary gross-based approach was rejected, and the Tribunal&#039;s view allowing gross dividend and gross royalty deductions was disapproved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>