<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 202 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376181</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues including the addition of freight inward expenses to closing inventory, cost of rejection of goods, provision for material price increase, scrap material cost, prior period expenses, and more. Disallowances were deleted for expenses like commission, advertisement costs, and payments for advisory services. The Tribunal also clarified tax deductions related to various expenses and held that certain disallowances lacked proper justification. The Tribunal remanded one issue back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination. Overall, the Tribunal largely favored the assessee in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 08:26:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 202 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376181</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues including the addition of freight inward expenses to closing inventory, cost of rejection of goods, provision for material price increase, scrap material cost, prior period expenses, and more. Disallowances were deleted for expenses like commission, advertisement costs, and payments for advisory services. The Tribunal also clarified tax deductions related to various expenses and held that certain disallowances lacked proper justification. The Tribunal remanded one issue back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination. Overall, the Tribunal largely favored the assessee in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>