<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 199 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376178</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to re-examine the documents and determine the country of origin conclusively. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear evidence to establish the country of origin as Russia to qualify for the benefit under Notification 48/2012. The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, providing the appellant with an opportunity to produce additional documents to support the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 08:26:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 199 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376178</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to re-examine the documents and determine the country of origin conclusively. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear evidence to establish the country of origin as Russia to qualify for the benefit under Notification 48/2012. The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, providing the appellant with an opportunity to produce additional documents to support the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>