<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 197 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376176</link>
    <description>The SC upheld penalties imposed by SEBI for securities violations. In the first matter, the court affirmed a Rs. 3 lakh penalty under Section 15HB for manipulative trading, finding that synchronized trading between broker groups indicated fraudulent activity based on preponderance of probability test. In the second matter, the court upheld a Rs. 1 crore penalty under Section 15A(a) for non-compliance with SEBI notices during investigation of unauthorized fund mobilization schemes. The appellants&#039; claim that sealed offices prevented document submission was rejected as belated and contradicted by their partial submissions during proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 197 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376176</link>
      <description>The SC upheld penalties imposed by SEBI for securities violations. In the first matter, the court affirmed a Rs. 3 lakh penalty under Section 15HB for manipulative trading, finding that synchronized trading between broker groups indicated fraudulent activity based on preponderance of probability test. In the second matter, the court upheld a Rs. 1 crore penalty under Section 15A(a) for non-compliance with SEBI notices during investigation of unauthorized fund mobilization schemes. The appellants&#039; claim that sealed offices prevented document submission was rejected as belated and contradicted by their partial submissions during proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>