<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 54 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17110</link>
    <description>The retrospective insertion of section 28(iiia) and the corresponding expansion of section 2(24) brought sale proceeds of import licences within taxable business income, so the earlier dispute over whether premium on transfer of import entitlements was taxable no longer survived for the assessment year in question. In view of those amendments, the reference under section 256(1) became academic and was returned unanswered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:42:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 54 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17110</link>
      <description>The retrospective insertion of section 28(iiia) and the corresponding expansion of section 2(24) brought sale proceeds of import licences within taxable business income, so the earlier dispute over whether premium on transfer of import entitlements was taxable no longer survived for the assessment year in question. In view of those amendments, the reference under section 256(1) became academic and was returned unanswered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>