<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 188 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376167</link>
    <description>The appeal involved penalties imposed on a cooperative society for non-payment of service tax. The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demands, modified penalties were upheld, and an additional penalty was ordered by the Revisionary Authority. The appellant contested the penalties, arguing the revision was unnecessary and questioning the timing of the revision order. The Tribunal referred to a case exempting services related to electricity distribution from tax liability, leading to the setting aside of penalties. Applying the same ratio, the Tribunal set aside the additional penalties, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 08:25:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 188 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376167</link>
      <description>The appeal involved penalties imposed on a cooperative society for non-payment of service tax. The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demands, modified penalties were upheld, and an additional penalty was ordered by the Revisionary Authority. The appellant contested the penalties, arguing the revision was unnecessary and questioning the timing of the revision order. The Tribunal referred to a case exempting services related to electricity distribution from tax liability, leading to the setting aside of penalties. Applying the same ratio, the Tribunal set aside the additional penalties, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>