<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 186 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376165</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD clarified that banking charges deducted by the appellant were not considered as consideration for providing services under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal categorized the transactions between the appellant and companies with captive power generation plants as sale and purchase of goods, not involving any service element. Consequently, the Service Tax demand of &amp;amp;8377;2,01,90,176 for the period from 2009-10 to 2013-14 was nullified, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 186 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376165</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD clarified that banking charges deducted by the appellant were not considered as consideration for providing services under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal categorized the transactions between the appellant and companies with captive power generation plants as sale and purchase of goods, not involving any service element. Consequently, the Service Tax demand of &amp;amp;8377;2,01,90,176 for the period from 2009-10 to 2013-14 was nullified, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>