<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376157</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the denial of Cenvat Credit for service tax paid on security guard services outside the factory premises. The appellant successfully argued that the services had a nexus to the manufacturing activity, qualifying them as input services under the broad interpretation of the definition. Citing precedents and highlighting the proximity of the services to the manufacturing site, the Tribunal set aside the initial denial and permitted the appellant to avail the Cenvat Credit for the security guard services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 08:24:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376157</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the denial of Cenvat Credit for service tax paid on security guard services outside the factory premises. The appellant successfully argued that the services had a nexus to the manufacturing activity, qualifying them as input services under the broad interpretation of the definition. Citing precedents and highlighting the proximity of the services to the manufacturing site, the Tribunal set aside the initial denial and permitted the appellant to avail the Cenvat Credit for the security guard services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>