<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 168 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376147</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an order under the U.P. GST Act was not entertained because the statute provided an efficacious appellate remedy. The High Court noted that the appellate forum can examine questions of both fact and law, and held that even a pure question of law does not justify bypassing the statutory appeal. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the appeal mechanism, and writ jurisdiction was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 168 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376147</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an order under the U.P. GST Act was not entertained because the statute provided an efficacious appellate remedy. The High Court noted that the appellate forum can examine questions of both fact and law, and held that even a pure question of law does not justify bypassing the statutory appeal. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the appeal mechanism, and writ jurisdiction was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>