<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 167 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376146</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the ITAT&#039;s order, holding that the rectification application was barred by the principle of finality and the doctrine of merger. The Court criticized the ITAT&#039;s misappreciation of its jurisdiction and strongly discouraged the invocation of rectification powers. The writ petition was allowed, and the assessee was directed to bear the costs of the proceedings amounting to Rs. 1.5 lakhs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 167 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376146</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the ITAT&#039;s order, holding that the rectification application was barred by the principle of finality and the doctrine of merger. The Court criticized the ITAT&#039;s misappreciation of its jurisdiction and strongly discouraged the invocation of rectification powers. The writ petition was allowed, and the assessee was directed to bear the costs of the proceedings amounting to Rs. 1.5 lakhs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>