https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279104 The Supreme Court appointed an Amicus Curiae to represent home buyers in a real estate dispute, ensuring their interests were safeguarded. The Court directed the builder to deposit 10% of dues for possession of flats and allowed finishing work by flat owners. A portal for refund applications was mandated, overseen by a designated individual. The developer was ordered to deposit funds for the portal and its directors were required to appear in court. The judgment aimed to address home buyers' concerns, ensure flat completion and possession, establish a refund process, and enforce developer accountability. en-us Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Mar 2019 07:41:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279104 The Supreme Court appointed an Amicus Curiae to represent home buyers in a real estate dispute, ensuring their interests were safeguarded. The Court directed the builder to deposit 10% of dues for possession of flats and allowed finishing work by flat owners. A portal for refund applications was mandated, overseen by a designated individual. The developer was ordered to deposit funds for the portal and its directors were required to appear in court. The judgment aimed to address home buyers' concerns, ensure flat completion and possession, establish a refund process, and enforce developer accountability. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279104