https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279106 The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 due to the lack of proper service of the demand notice under Section 8 on the Respondent. Emphasizing the necessity of adhering to prescribed rules for initiating insolvency proceedings, the Tribunal held that mere service at the corporate office did not fulfill the requirement of delivering the notice at the registered office or to key personnel. The decision highlights the critical importance of strict compliance with legal procedures in insolvency cases to uphold fairness and due process. en-us Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Mar 2019 07:41:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279106 The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 due to the lack of proper service of the demand notice under Section 8 on the Respondent. Emphasizing the necessity of adhering to prescribed rules for initiating insolvency proceedings, the Tribunal held that mere service at the corporate office did not fulfill the requirement of delivering the notice at the registered office or to key personnel. The decision highlights the critical importance of strict compliance with legal procedures in insolvency cases to uphold fairness and due process. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279106