<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 304 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279096</link>
    <description>Execution of a will that is admitted in pleadings does not require proof through attesting witness evidence, because the dispute then concerns legal effect rather than execution. A settlement deed and connected adoption deed that confine a Hindu female&#039;s rights to lifetime enjoyment, pocket expenses, maintenance, and reversion on death create only a limited estate, so Section 14(2) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 applies rather than Section 14(1). Property validly bequeathed to her under the husband&#039;s will became absolute and could be further transferred, but the item not so acquired remained with the plaintiff as heir of the adopted son, with mesne profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 16:16:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 304 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279096</link>
      <description>Execution of a will that is admitted in pleadings does not require proof through attesting witness evidence, because the dispute then concerns legal effect rather than execution. A settlement deed and connected adoption deed that confine a Hindu female&#039;s rights to lifetime enjoyment, pocket expenses, maintenance, and reversion on death create only a limited estate, so Section 14(2) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 applies rather than Section 14(1). Property validly bequeathed to her under the husband&#039;s will became absolute and could be further transferred, but the item not so acquired remained with the plaintiff as heir of the adopted son, with mesne profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>