<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 135 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376114</link>
    <description>The case involved the addition of income from international transactions under Section 92C(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision regarding the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) fixation by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The Tribunal found that the TPO&#039;s actions were in line with legislative intent to prevent profit suppression through price manipulation. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s objections to the ALP fixation, emphasizing the importance of preventing tax avoidance in transactions with Associated Enterprises. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the Revenue, with each party bearing their costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:53:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 135 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376114</link>
      <description>The case involved the addition of income from international transactions under Section 92C(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision regarding the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) fixation by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The Tribunal found that the TPO&#039;s actions were in line with legislative intent to prevent profit suppression through price manipulation. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s objections to the ALP fixation, emphasizing the importance of preventing tax avoidance in transactions with Associated Enterprises. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the Revenue, with each party bearing their costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>