<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 123 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376102</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the petition filed by Credit Suisse AG under section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code against Corporate Debtor, Crest Steel &amp;amp; Power Private Limited, due to a genuine dispute over the amount claimed for poor quality goods supplied. The Tribunal found the dispute regarding the unpaid operational debt to be valid, supported by communications and documents, emphasizing the importance of assessing the merits of disputes in insolvency cases. The decision highlighted the necessity of clear communication and evidence to substantiate claims. The Registry was instructed to promptly communicate the order to both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:51:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 123 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376102</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the petition filed by Credit Suisse AG under section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code against Corporate Debtor, Crest Steel &amp;amp; Power Private Limited, due to a genuine dispute over the amount claimed for poor quality goods supplied. The Tribunal found the dispute regarding the unpaid operational debt to be valid, supported by communications and documents, emphasizing the importance of assessing the merits of disputes in insolvency cases. The decision highlighted the necessity of clear communication and evidence to substantiate claims. The Registry was instructed to promptly communicate the order to both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>