<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 103 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned orders to direct that refund claims should be allowed in cash rather than being credited to the Cenvat credit account, in accordance with Section 142 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. As a result, the appellant was entitled to receive the refund claims in cash, settling the matter in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2019 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 103 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned orders to direct that refund claims should be allowed in cash rather than being credited to the Cenvat credit account, in accordance with Section 142 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. As a result, the appellant was entitled to receive the refund claims in cash, settling the matter in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>