<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 100 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376079</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and allowed the appeal, ruling that iron ore fines arising during pig iron manufacturing are not excisable goods. It determined that no CENVAT credit reversal was necessary for such fines and rejected the retrospective application of a notification, specifying that reversal was mandated post 01.03.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 100 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376079</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and allowed the appeal, ruling that iron ore fines arising during pig iron manufacturing are not excisable goods. It determined that no CENVAT credit reversal was necessary for such fines and rejected the retrospective application of a notification, specifying that reversal was mandated post 01.03.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>