https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376072 Vague and evasive denials do not defeat judgment on admissions under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, because denials must meet the substance of the pleading with specific material particulars. A bare plea that property was acquired from joint family or benami funds is insufficient where the defendant does not plead the factual basis for a Hindu undivided family or supporting facts, and such a claim is barred by the Benami Act unless a recognised exception is properly made out. A person who entered as a licensee cannot deny the licensor's title or claim a right to remain in possession by relying on an unparticularised subsequent assertion of ownership or residence rights. en-us Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376072 Vague and evasive denials do not defeat judgment on admissions under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, because denials must meet the substance of the pleading with specific material particulars. A bare plea that property was acquired from joint family or benami funds is insufficient where the defendant does not plead the factual basis for a Hindu undivided family or supporting facts, and such a claim is barred by the Benami Act unless a recognised exception is properly made out. A person who entered as a licensee cannot deny the licensor's title or claim a right to remain in possession by relying on an unparticularised subsequent assertion of ownership or residence rights. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376072