<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 90 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders confirming the addition of interest income by the AO for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2007-08. The Tribunal directed a fresh examination, allowing the assessee the opportunity to substantiate its case regarding the commercial purpose of advances made to M/s. Topaz Investments Pvt. Ltd. The challenge to the validity of assessment reopening in AY 2006-07 and 2007-08 was not addressed, leading to all appeals of the assessee being treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 90 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders confirming the addition of interest income by the AO for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2007-08. The Tribunal directed a fresh examination, allowing the assessee the opportunity to substantiate its case regarding the commercial purpose of advances made to M/s. Topaz Investments Pvt. Ltd. The challenge to the validity of assessment reopening in AY 2006-07 and 2007-08 was not addressed, leading to all appeals of the assessee being treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>