<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 80 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act as the Assessing Officer failed to record satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings in the assessment order. The penalty was based on disallowances that were not validly initiated, leading to the cancellation of the penalty. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the stay application was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 80 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act as the Assessing Officer failed to record satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings in the assessment order. The penalty was based on disallowances that were not validly initiated, leading to the cancellation of the penalty. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the stay application was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>