<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1846 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279084</link>
    <description>Sale of student-essential items inside school premises, confined to students, was treated as incidental to education and not commercialization. A complete ban on sale of non-NCERT books and uniforms was held disproportionate and invalid under the test of reasonable restriction, and the selective permission for NCERT books and stationery while excluding other student necessities was found arbitrary and discriminatory for lack of intelligible differentia and rational nexus. The circulars were not struck down for inconsistency with the affiliation bye-laws or statutory rules, since a circular cannot override law but the challenged restrictions failed on unreasonableness and non-arbitrariness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:31:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1846 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279084</link>
      <description>Sale of student-essential items inside school premises, confined to students, was treated as incidental to education and not commercialization. A complete ban on sale of non-NCERT books and uniforms was held disproportionate and invalid under the test of reasonable restriction, and the selective permission for NCERT books and stationery while excluding other student necessities was found arbitrary and discriminatory for lack of intelligible differentia and rational nexus. The circulars were not struck down for inconsistency with the affiliation bye-laws or statutory rules, since a circular cannot override law but the challenged restrictions failed on unreasonableness and non-arbitrariness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>