https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279087 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer on grounds of undervaluation of sales, estimated GP, and clandestine removal of goods for different Assessment Years. The Court found that the Tribunal's actions were justified based on the CESTAT judgment in favor of the assessee regarding an excise show-cause notice. As a result, the Appeals were dismissed as no question of law was found to arise. en-us Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:31:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279087 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer on grounds of undervaluation of sales, estimated GP, and clandestine removal of goods for different Assessment Years. The Court found that the Tribunal's actions were justified based on the CESTAT judgment in favor of the assessee regarding an excise show-cause notice. As a result, the Appeals were dismissed as no question of law was found to arise. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279087