<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1493 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279071</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals filed by the assessees, directing the deletion of additions made under sections 2(22)(a), 115-O, and 56(2)(vii) and dismissing the allegation of transactions being a colourable device. The Tribunal recognized the transfer agreements as &quot;gift agreements,&quot; making the transactions exempt under section 47(iii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:31:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1493 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279071</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals filed by the assessees, directing the deletion of additions made under sections 2(22)(a), 115-O, and 56(2)(vii) and dismissing the allegation of transactions being a colourable device. The Tribunal recognized the transfer agreements as &quot;gift agreements,&quot; making the transactions exempt under section 47(iii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>