<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1490 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to disallow commission expenses of Rs. 90,00,000/- paid to Shri B.S. Agarwal for the sale of a plot. It was found that the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) lacked commercial traits, Shri Agarwal did not render any services, and the genuineness of the expenditure was not proven. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:31:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1490 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to disallow commission expenses of Rs. 90,00,000/- paid to Shri B.S. Agarwal for the sale of a plot. It was found that the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) lacked commercial traits, Shri Agarwal did not render any services, and the genuineness of the expenditure was not proven. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>