<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1732 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279080</link>
    <description>Where an activity was treated as manufacture, the order found no enforceable duty liability because the assessee was entitled to exemption under the notification. Any duty paid through cash or Cenvat credit was therefore refundable, leaving the matter revenue neutral. On that basis, the duty demand could not survive, and the associated interest and penalty were also treated as unsustainable. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:31:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1732 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279080</link>
      <description>Where an activity was treated as manufacture, the order found no enforceable duty liability because the assessee was entitled to exemption under the notification. Any duty paid through cash or Cenvat credit was therefore refundable, leaving the matter revenue neutral. On that basis, the duty demand could not survive, and the associated interest and penalty were also treated as unsustainable. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>