https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279078 The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the original authority for a comprehensive reevaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the need to determine the actual manufacturer of the goods, clarify the classification of job workers, assess duty on immovable property, examine suppression of facts, and consider the limitation period. The impugned order was set aside due to inadequate examination of these crucial aspects, and a fresh decision was required to ensure compliance with legal principles. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:31:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279078 The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the original authority for a comprehensive reevaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the need to determine the actual manufacturer of the goods, clarify the classification of job workers, assess duty on immovable property, examine suppression of facts, and consider the limitation period. The impugned order was set aside due to inadequate examination of these crucial aspects, and a fresh decision was required to ensure compliance with legal principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279078