<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 84 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17080</link>
    <description>A will must be construed as a whole to ascertain the testator&#039;s intention, and an unequivocal declaration in the will can impress self-acquired property with the character of joint family property. Where the recitals showed that the deceased and his sons were living as an undivided Hindu family and that the properties, including the business, were thrown into the common stock for family benefit, the property was treated as joint family property. The absence of previously existing joint family property did not prevent that result when the intention was clear. The reference was answered in favour of the accountable person and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:12:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 84 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17080</link>
      <description>A will must be construed as a whole to ascertain the testator&#039;s intention, and an unequivocal declaration in the will can impress self-acquired property with the character of joint family property. Where the recitals showed that the deceased and his sons were living as an undivided Hindu family and that the properties, including the business, were thrown into the common stock for family benefit, the property was treated as joint family property. The absence of previously existing joint family property did not prevent that result when the intention was clear. The reference was answered in favour of the accountable person and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>