<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 672 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279058</link>
    <description>On a reference under section 255(4), the Third Member agreed with the Judicial Member on the referred issue, and the majority view resolved the dispute in favour of the assessee. The remaining grounds, on which there was no difference of opinion, were governed by the earlier proposed orders of the Members. The appeal was accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 14:53:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 672 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279058</link>
      <description>On a reference under section 255(4), the Third Member agreed with the Judicial Member on the referred issue, and the majority view resolved the dispute in favour of the assessee. The remaining grounds, on which there was no difference of opinion, were governed by the earlier proposed orders of the Members. The appeal was accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>