<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 59 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376038</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the assessee&#039;s claim under Section 10A for the assessment year 1999-2000, ruling that the amendment extending the exemption period to ten years should apply to the assessee, despite having already availed the benefit for a shorter period under the unamended provision. The court emphasized the legislative intent behind the amendment to provide the benefit for a continuous ten-year period and held in favor of the assessee, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:48:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 59 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376038</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the assessee&#039;s claim under Section 10A for the assessment year 1999-2000, ruling that the amendment extending the exemption period to ten years should apply to the assessee, despite having already availed the benefit for a shorter period under the unamended provision. The court emphasized the legislative intent behind the amendment to provide the benefit for a continuous ten-year period and held in favor of the assessee, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>