<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 58 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376037</link>
    <description>Non-prosecution of an appeal may justify dismissal in limine where the appellant remains unrepresented and fails to pursue the proceedings. Rule 19 of the ITAT Rules, 1963 recognises the need for effective prosecution beyond merely filing an appeal. Where a party neither appears at the hearing nor assists the adjudicatory process, the appeal may be disposed of for want of prosecution. The appeal was dismissed in limine on this basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:47:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 58 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376037</link>
      <description>Non-prosecution of an appeal may justify dismissal in limine where the appellant remains unrepresented and fails to pursue the proceedings. Rule 19 of the ITAT Rules, 1963 recognises the need for effective prosecution beyond merely filing an appeal. Where a party neither appears at the hearing nor assists the adjudicatory process, the appeal may be disposed of for want of prosecution. The appeal was dismissed in limine on this basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>