https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376029 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the constitutionality of amendments made via Finance Acts as Money Bills. The petitioner, a Member of Rajya Sabha, argued that certain sections of Finance Acts were ultra vires the Constitution of India. However, the court held that the delay in challenging the amendments, lack of locus standi, and absence of a valid cause of action were significant factors. The court concluded that there was no basis for exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in this case. en-us Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376029 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the constitutionality of amendments made via Finance Acts as Money Bills. The petitioner, a Member of Rajya Sabha, argued that certain sections of Finance Acts were ultra vires the Constitution of India. However, the court held that the delay in challenging the amendments, lack of locus standi, and absence of a valid cause of action were significant factors. The court concluded that there was no basis for exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in this case. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376029