<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 49 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the rejection of a refund claim based on unjust enrichment, finding no evidence that service tax was paid by recipients to the appellant. The rejection was deemed incorrect as it relied on conjectures and irrelevant statistics. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s Chartered Accountant&#039;s Certificate, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision was pronounced on 28.02.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:46:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 49 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the rejection of a refund claim based on unjust enrichment, finding no evidence that service tax was paid by recipients to the appellant. The rejection was deemed incorrect as it relied on conjectures and irrelevant statistics. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s Chartered Accountant&#039;s Certificate, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision was pronounced on 28.02.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>