https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376027 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing cenvat credit on "House Keeping Services" based on judicial precedence. Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the appellant's refund claim date of 27.06.2017, attributing the delay to the Department's processing issues rather than the appellant's filing. The rejection of the claim by the Commissioner (Appeals) was set aside, granting the appellant consequential benefits. The judgment highlighted adherence to legal provisions and recognized the appellant's compliance with regulations. en-us Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:46:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376027 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing cenvat credit on "House Keeping Services" based on judicial precedence. Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the appellant's refund claim date of 27.06.2017, attributing the delay to the Department's processing issues rather than the appellant's filing. The rejection of the claim by the Commissioner (Appeals) was set aside, granting the appellant consequential benefits. The judgment highlighted adherence to legal provisions and recognized the appellant's compliance with regulations. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376027