<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 47 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for de novo adjudication to determine if the appellants provided only General Insurance Service, not Insurance Auxiliary Service. The matter was sent back for further assessment considering evidence and submissions to clarify the nature of services provided. The appeal was allowed for reevaluation by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:46:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 47 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for de novo adjudication to determine if the appellants provided only General Insurance Service, not Insurance Auxiliary Service. The matter was sent back for further assessment considering evidence and submissions to clarify the nature of services provided. The appeal was allowed for reevaluation by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>