https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376018 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax made in the impugned order. It held that the services provided by the appellant should be classified as Works Contract Service, in accordance with the Supreme Court decision. The Tribunal emphasized that demands raised under the wrong category cannot be sustained, leading to the allowance of the appeal and the correct classification of the services for service tax purposes. en-us Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:46:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376018 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax made in the impugned order. It held that the services provided by the appellant should be classified as Works Contract Service, in accordance with the Supreme Court decision. The Tribunal emphasized that demands raised under the wrong category cannot be sustained, leading to the allowance of the appeal and the correct classification of the services for service tax purposes. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376018