https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376011 The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 10,97,718 for non-payment under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's challenge was successful as the Tribunal found the Department's demand to be erroneous, ruling that the appellant had already complied with Rule 6(3A) by reversing the correct proportionate amount. Consequently, the appellant was relieved from liability for interest and penalty, aligning with legal interpretation and precedents cited during the proceedings. en-us Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:45:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376011 The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 10,97,718 for non-payment under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's challenge was successful as the Tribunal found the Department's demand to be erroneous, ruling that the appellant had already complied with Rule 6(3A) by reversing the correct proportionate amount. Consequently, the appellant was relieved from liability for interest and penalty, aligning with legal interpretation and precedents cited during the proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376011