https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376010 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and ruling that the demand for 6% of the sale value of electricity as a dutiable product was not legally sustainable. The Tribunal found that the issue had been conclusively settled in favor of the appellants in earlier cases, citing specific judgments and precedents. Based on established legal principles, the Tribunal held that the appellants were not liable to pay the demanded amount, thus favoring the appellants in the case. en-us Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:45:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376010 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and ruling that the demand for 6% of the sale value of electricity as a dutiable product was not legally sustainable. The Tribunal found that the issue had been conclusively settled in favor of the appellants in earlier cases, citing specific judgments and precedents. Based on established legal principles, the Tribunal held that the appellants were not liable to pay the demanded amount, thus favoring the appellants in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376010