<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 19 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375998</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the claim for set off of unabsorbed depreciation under section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the exclusion of section 32 in such computations. The Court also affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s direction to remand the issue of set off of unabsorbed business loss for fresh computation, dismissing the appeal and providing a detailed analysis of the legislative intent behind the computation of profits and gains for eligible assesses under section 44BB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 19 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375998</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the claim for set off of unabsorbed depreciation under section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the exclusion of section 32 in such computations. The Court also affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s direction to remand the issue of set off of unabsorbed business loss for fresh computation, dismissing the appeal and providing a detailed analysis of the legislative intent behind the computation of profits and gains for eligible assesses under section 44BB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>