<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375996</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the treatment of interest income and miscellaneous income. The court emphasized the nexus between interest income and the business undertaking, allowing for consideration of the netting principle in relation to interest income. It concluded that miscellaneous income from the sale of scrap could be treated as business income for a telecommunications company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375996</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the treatment of interest income and miscellaneous income. The court emphasized the nexus between interest income and the business undertaking, allowing for consideration of the netting principle in relation to interest income. It concluded that miscellaneous income from the sale of scrap could be treated as business income for a telecommunications company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>