<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 14 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375993</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment clarified the application of Section 80-1A for companies with multiple industrial units, emphasizing the independent treatment of units for deduction eligibility. The case highlighted the importance of separate agreements and financial statements to support claims for deduction under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 14 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375993</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment clarified the application of Section 80-1A for companies with multiple industrial units, emphasizing the independent treatment of units for deduction eligibility. The case highlighted the importance of separate agreements and financial statements to support claims for deduction under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>