<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 91 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17058</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming that the deduction under section 35CCA of the Income Tax Act was justified based on compliance with statutory requirements. The Court held that the assessee fulfilled all necessary conditions for claiming the deduction, emphasizing that payments were made to approved institutions and necessary certificates were provided. The lack of response from the institutions to IT notices did not invalidate the claim, as long as payments were made to approved entities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 05:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 91 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17058</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming that the deduction under section 35CCA of the Income Tax Act was justified based on compliance with statutory requirements. The Court held that the assessee fulfilled all necessary conditions for claiming the deduction, emphasizing that payments were made to approved institutions and necessary certificates were provided. The lack of response from the institutions to IT notices did not invalidate the claim, as long as payments were made to approved entities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>