<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 4 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375983</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the addition of notional interest on share application money without allotment of shares. It emphasized the availability of own funds for making deposits and concluded that no disallowance of interest expenses should be made, as the investments were made from interest-free funds necessary for the business. The Tribunal applied its decision to both appeals, allowing them and rejecting the taxation of notional interest as real income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 08:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 4 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375983</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the addition of notional interest on share application money without allotment of shares. It emphasized the availability of own funds for making deposits and concluded that no disallowance of interest expenses should be made, as the investments were made from interest-free funds necessary for the business. The Tribunal applied its decision to both appeals, allowing them and rejecting the taxation of notional interest as real income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>