<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1787 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279040</link>
    <description>The application filed by M/s. Elixir Enterprises &amp;amp; Hotels Pvt. Limited was rejected as non-maintainable by the Settlement Commission. The rejection was based on the application being barred under Section 32-O of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to a previous penalty for suppression of facts and the applicant&#039;s failure to make a true and full disclosure of their service tax liability. The Bench found the application non-maintainable and ordered that a copy of the rejection order be provided to the applicants and the jurisdictional Commissioner for implementation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:41:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1787 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279040</link>
      <description>The application filed by M/s. Elixir Enterprises &amp;amp; Hotels Pvt. Limited was rejected as non-maintainable by the Settlement Commission. The rejection was based on the application being barred under Section 32-O of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to a previous penalty for suppression of facts and the applicant&#039;s failure to make a true and full disclosure of their service tax liability. The Bench found the application non-maintainable and ordered that a copy of the rejection order be provided to the applicants and the jurisdictional Commissioner for implementation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>