https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279036 Deficiency in court fee on an amended plaint could be made good at the appellate stage where no prior order had fixed time for curing the shortfall after amendment. The appellate court was entitled to grant an opportunity to pay the deficit because an appeal is a continuation of the suit and its power is co-extensive with that of the trial court; the appellate court could also require payment of additional court fee. The Supreme Court held that the High Court, in supervisory jurisdiction, erred in interfering with an order that allowed the deficit to be cured and furthered justice. en-us Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:34:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279036 Deficiency in court fee on an amended plaint could be made good at the appellate stage where no prior order had fixed time for curing the shortfall after amendment. The appellate court was entitled to grant an opportunity to pay the deficit because an appeal is a continuation of the suit and its power is co-extensive with that of the trial court; the appellate court could also require payment of additional court fee. The Supreme Court held that the High Court, in supervisory jurisdiction, erred in interfering with an order that allowed the deficit to be cured and furthered justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279036