https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279020 Private defence was held unavailable where the accused's injuries were only minor abrasions, the medical evidence did not show any wound or serious injury supporting immediate necessity, and the accused had not promptly sought medical examination after the occurrence. The eye-witness account also contradicted the defence version. The Court noted that concurrent findings of fact are not to be disturbed unless perverse or causing manifest injustice, and no such error was shown. On that basis, the plea of private defence failed and the conviction under Section 302 IPC was maintained. en-us Wed, 04 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:39:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279020 Private defence was held unavailable where the accused's injuries were only minor abrasions, the medical evidence did not show any wound or serious injury supporting immediate necessity, and the accused had not promptly sought medical examination after the occurrence. The eye-witness account also contradicted the defence version. The Court noted that concurrent findings of fact are not to be disturbed unless perverse or causing manifest injustice, and no such error was shown. On that basis, the plea of private defence failed and the conviction under Section 302 IPC was maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279020