<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 879 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279020</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in an appeal regarding the acceptability of the plea of private defence against a conviction for murder. The court found that the accused&#039;s claim of acting in self-defence was not supported by the medico legal report or witness testimonies. Emphasizing the cautious consideration required for the right of private defence, the Supreme Court concluded that the injuries sustained by the accused were minor and insufficient to justify the extreme act of murder. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the original conviction. (By U Banerjee And A Bhan, JJ.)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 879 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279020</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in an appeal regarding the acceptability of the plea of private defence against a conviction for murder. The court found that the accused&#039;s claim of acting in self-defence was not supported by the medico legal report or witness testimonies. Emphasizing the cautious consideration required for the right of private defence, the Supreme Court concluded that the injuries sustained by the accused were minor and insufficient to justify the extreme act of murder. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the original conviction. (By U Banerjee And A Bhan, JJ.)</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>