<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17052</link>
    <description>For surtax capital computation, a later dividend appropriation was treated as relating back to the relevant accounting period, so the appropriated amount could not remain in general reserve on the first day of the previous year; this reduced the reserve available for capital purposes and the point was decided against the assessee. Relief allowed under Chapter VI-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was treated as a deduction from total income, not as income, profits and gains not includible in total income; accordingly, it did not fall within rule 4 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, and that issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:19:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17052</link>
      <description>For surtax capital computation, a later dividend appropriation was treated as relating back to the relevant accounting period, so the appropriated amount could not remain in general reserve on the first day of the previous year; this reduced the reserve available for capital purposes and the point was decided against the assessee. Relief allowed under Chapter VI-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was treated as a deduction from total income, not as income, profits and gains not includible in total income; accordingly, it did not fall within rule 4 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, and that issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>