<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 976 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279018</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed both the writ petition and the civil review petition, finding them devoid of substance. The allegations against the previous set of lawyers were found to be false, and the Court upheld the original order directing the removal of the building constructed by the Rotary Club on National Highway 31. The judgment also called for regulatory measures to address the conduct of lawyers and litigants in such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:33:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 976 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279018</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed both the writ petition and the civil review petition, finding them devoid of substance. The allegations against the previous set of lawyers were found to be false, and the Court upheld the original order directing the removal of the building constructed by the Rotary Club on National Highway 31. The judgment also called for regulatory measures to address the conduct of lawyers and litigants in such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>