https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279017 An authority that reconsiders or reviews a decision affecting civil rights must afford the affected party a fair hearing, even if the governing rules do not expressly provide for review. The impugned review and reiteration orders were invalid because they were made without notice or opportunity of hearing, and the refusal to quash them on the ground that relief would be academic was unjustified since the orders could continue to operate unless set aside. The Court therefore quashed the later orders for breach of natural justice and restored the position before the review. en-us Tue, 28 Nov 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:12:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279017 An authority that reconsiders or reviews a decision affecting civil rights must afford the affected party a fair hearing, even if the governing rules do not expressly provide for review. The impugned review and reiteration orders were invalid because they were made without notice or opportunity of hearing, and the refusal to quash them on the ground that relief would be academic was unjustified since the orders could continue to operate unless set aside. The Court therefore quashed the later orders for breach of natural justice and restored the position before the review. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Nov 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279017